|
|
Applied
research at NICA in radiation materials sciences,
life sciences
and new methods of energy production
Theme
leaders:
|
O.V. Belov
E.M. Syresin
|
Participating
countries and international organizations:
Armenia,
Belarus, Bulgaria, Mexico, Moldova, Russia, South Africa, Uzbekistan.
The
problem under study and the main purpose of the research:
Obtaining
applied research and technology results within the areas ARIADNA
collaborations' activity, including life sciences, biomedical
technologies, space research, radiation materials science, radiation
hardeness of electronics, development of new technologies for ADS
using NICA beams.
Project
in the theme:
|
|
Name
of the project
|
Project
Leaders
|
Project
code
|
1.
|
Accelerator
Driven Subcritical Reactor
(ADSR)
|
S.I.
Tyutyunnikov
M. Paraipan
|
07-1-1107-1-2018/2027
|
Project:
|
|
Name
of the project
Laboratory
(Subdivision)
|
Project
Leaders
Responsible from laboratories
|
Status
|
1.
|
Accelerator
Driven Subcritical Reactor
(ADSR)
|
S.I.
Tyutyunnikov
M. Paraipan
|
|
|
VBLHEP,
FLNP, DLNP,
FLNR, BLTB, LRB
|
see
list of activities
|
|
Brief
annotation and scientific rationale:
The
project is aimed to determine the optimum beam-converter combination
meant to optimize the efficiency of an accelerator driven subcritical
reactor. The planned research will be oriented in two
directions. The first involves the comparative study of the fission
distribution and the energy released in enriched fuel blanket,
irradiated with proton beams with energy 0.2–2 GeV and ion
beams with masses until 20Ne
and energies in the interval 0.2 – 1 AGeV. The second consists
in measurements of the neutron yield from various converters,
irradiated with proton and ion beams.
A
possibility to realize a nuclear system with increased burning
capabilities is to use an accelerator driven subcritical reactor
(ADSR). It consists of a particle accelerator coupled with a nuclear
reactor. The particle beam striking a converter placed in the central
part of the reactor realizes a supplementary source of neutrons which
allows the functioning of the reactor in subcritical regime (with
criticality coefficient keff below
0.99), ensuring a safer exploitation of nuclear plants. The harder
neutron spectrum obtained ensures a better incineration of the
actinides.
In
spite of the almost generalized opinion that the optimal beam for ADS
is a proton beam with energy around 1–1.5 GeV we have shown in
a series of works that ion beams have a superior energetic efficiency
than protons. The activities within the project are oriented towards
searching the conditions which maximize the energy efficiency of ADSR
and ensure high burnup. Within the previous years, aspects related
with the core geometry, the material used for the converter, the fuel
composition, the working value of keff,
the enrichment and power density distribution were investigated. The
influence of the beam characteristics (particle type, energy, beam
intensity), and of the accelerator type were also studied. The main
conclusions obtained constitute the bases for extending
the project in accordance with the stated objectives.
The
proposed graphite target “GAMMA4” with fuel rods inserted
inside and a central hole for the placement of different converters
allows a correct comparison between the number of fissions and the
energy released realized with proton and ion beams. The use of a
graphite block instead of Pb gives the possibility to diminish the
necessary amount of fissile material due to the softer neutron
spectrum. Such target is easier to manipulate (due to its lower
weight) and cheaper. The
proposed graphite target “GAMMA4” is suitable for a
comparative study of the efficiency of various beams in terms of the
possibility of their use in ADS.
Expected
results upon completion of the project:
Selection
of on an optimal design of a target of the ADS;
Verification
of a principally new concept of a system based on the use of ion
beams instead of protons;
Implementation
of the first stage of experimental programme focused on measurement
of neutron yields with different converter combinations.
Expected
results of the project in the current year:
Determination
of the optimal target design for the ADS.
Obtaining
simulation results on the optimal design of the target for ADS.
Activities:
|
|
|
Name
of the activity
|
Leaders
|
Status
|
|
Laboratory
(Subdivision)
|
Responsible
from laboratories
|
1.
|
R&D
within the research topics
of the ARIADNA collaborations: experiments
in
space research, life sciences, biomedical technologies, materials
sciences and structure of matter, radiation hardening of
electronics and advanced nuclear physics technologies
|
O.V.
Belov
S.I. Tyutyunnikov
|
Data
taking
Data analysis
|
|
|
|
VBLHEP
|
V.A.
Artyukh,
S.
Ceballos,
V. Dzhavadova, Yu.S. Kovalev,
I.A.
Kryachko,
I.I. Maryin, Yu.A.
Murin,
M.S. Novikov,
N.E. Pukhaeva, A. Rodriguez, A.V. Rogachev,
Z.Ya.
Sadygov,
A.A.
Slivin,
V.N.
Shalyapin,
G.I.
Smirnov,
E.M.
Syresin
|
|
DLNP
|
A.V.
Agapov, K.V. Belokopytova, G.V. Mitsyn, A.G. Molokanov, A.V.
Rzyanina, V.I. Stegailov, S.V. Shvidkiy
|
|
FLNR
|
P.Yu.
Apel, A.N. Nechaev, A.N. Osipov
|
|
FLNP
|
M.V.
Bulavin
|
|
BLTP
|
V.A.
Osipov
|
2.
|
R&D
on optimization of methods for irradiating samples of various
types; development of the supporting equipment for ARIADNA
target stations. Development of laboratory
areas for
deployment of the user equipment
|
O.V.
Belov
|
|
|
VBLHEP
|
M.S.
Novikov, E.S. Matyukhanov, A.V. Shemchuk
|
|
DLNP
|
K.V.
Belokopytov, G.V. Mitsyn,
|
3.
|
Upgrade
of spectrum-analitical
complex for activation measurements
|
V.N.
Shalyapin
V.I. Stegaylov
|
|
|
VBLHEP
|
I.A.
Kryachko, E.V. Strekalovskaya, Toan Tran Ngor
|
|
DLNP
|
V.I.
Stegaylov
|
4.
|
Software
development and dosimetric calculations for ARIADNA
experiments. Simulation of radiation
conditions at the
NICA complex
|
M.
Paraipan
|
|
|
VBLHEP
|
K.V.
Belokopytov, O.V. Belov, Chan Ngoc T., V. Javadova,
A.A.
Slivin
|
|
LRB
|
A.V.
Chizhov
|
5.
|
Study
of the radiation effects and superconducting properties of 2nd
generation HTSC tapes. Development
of
magnetic and cryogenic HTSC systems
for experimental
facilitues
|
M.S.
Novikov
S.I. Tyutyunnikov
|
|
|
VBLHEP
|
Yu.P.
Filippov, M.S. Novikov, E.S. Matyukhanov, A.V. Shemchuk
|
|
FLNP
|
A.N.
Chernikov
|
6.
|
Organization
and maintenance of the
user program ARIADNA. Development
of ARIADNA collaborations
|
O.V.
Belov
|
|
|
VBLHEP
|
M.S.
Novikov,
M.
Paraipan,
Yu.A.
Tsaplina,
S.I. Tyutyunnikov
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration
Country
or International Organization
|
City
|
Institute
or laboratory
|
Armenia
|
Yerevan
|
CANDLE
|
|
|
YSU
|
Belarus
|
Minsk
|
INP
BSU
|
|
|
BSU
|
|
|
JIPNR-Sosny
NASB
|
Bulgaria
|
Plovdiv
|
MUP
|
Mexico
|
Mexico
City
|
INCan
|
Moldova
|
Chisinau
|
MSU
|
Russia
|
Dolgoprudny
|
MIPT
|
|
Dubna
|
BSINP
MSU
|
|
|
IAS
“Omega”
|
|
|
IPTP
|
|
Moscow
|
“Kvant-R”
|
|
|
FMBC
|
|
|
IBMP
RAS
|
|
|
ICP
RAS
|
|
|
IGIC
RAS
|
|
|
ITEP
|
|
|
JIHT
RAS
|
|
|
NNRU
“MEPhI”
|
|
|
SINP
MSU
|
|
Obninsk
|
NMRRC
|
|
Puschino
|
ITEB
RAS
|
|
Saint
Petersburg
|
SPbSU
|
|
Tomsk
|
TPU
|
|
Vladikavkaz
|
NOSU
|
South
Africa
|
Somerset
West
|
iThemba
LABS
|
|
Stellenbosch
|
SU
|
Uzbekistan
|
Tashkent
|
INP
AS RU
|
| |
▲ |
|